State v. Hall, Unpublished Decision (1-24-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
With regard to Defendant's twelfth assignment of error, I respectfully disagree with the majority's conclusion that the trial court made the requisite findings on the record when it sentenced Defendant to consecutive sentences. Such findings must be made on the record at thesentencing hearing. See State v. Riggs (Oct. 11, 2000), Summit App. No. 19846, unreported, at 7-9 (Whitmore, J., dissenting). Moreover, in its recent decision in Woods v. Telb (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 504, paragraph two of the syllabus, the Ohio Supreme Court mandated that a trial court "inform the defendant at sentencing or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2000