Legal Opinion

Crancer v. Board of Regents

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1986No. Docket 86107PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. C. Livo, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her claim pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq.

The trial court held that plaintiff was not a handicapper protected by the hcra, that the hcra imposed no duty on defendant such as that asserted by plaintiff, and that, the validity of the duty notwithstanding, the duty of accommodation proposed by plaintiff would be unduly burdensome to defendant. We affirm.

A motion for summary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Carr v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Acacia Park Cemetery Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Cebreco v. Music Hall Center for the Performing Arts, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Hoot Ex Rel. Hoot v. Milan Area SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. Doman v. City of Grosse Pointe FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Lindberg v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API