Legal Opinion
State v. Ogrinc
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 15, 1992No. 10737PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of heroin with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied (1) his motions for judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial and (2) his motion to dismiss because the notice requirements of General Statutes § 54-82c (c) were not satisfied. We disagree.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On June 25, 1989, at approximately 2 p.m.,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. AlfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. ReidConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.