Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corp. v. Wildermuth
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 4, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
An appeal was taken in this suit for patent infringement, and we have affirmed the decree holding the patent valid and its claims infringed. 34 F.(2d) 635. A petition for reargument was denied. The mandate of this court had not issued to the District Court before this application was made.
The application is for the plaintiff to show cause “why this cause should not be remitted to the District Court, directing it to reopen the proofs to take and consider evidence relating to the United States Signal Corps amplifier BC 59-A, and to transmit same with report thereon to this court, and why…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jenkins v. EldredgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
- Roemer v. BernheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Roemer v. NeumannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lewis v. TrantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Jensen v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Chicago & W. I. R. v. Chicago & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Vause v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931