Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Gardner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1918No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Livingston; Miner, J. Bill by Alexander H. Pearson against Edd Gardner and another for the specific performance of a land contract. Prom a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Bill for specific performance. On June 6, 1917, defendants entered into an oral contract with the plaintiff for the purchase of a house and lot in the village of Hamburg. At the time of the purchase the plaintiff gave the defendants the following receipt:

“Hamburg, Michigan, June 6 (there is a six and a seven over it), 1917.
“Received of Edd Gardner and Della Gardner One Hundred Dollars ($100) on purchase price of house *361and lot in Hamburg village. ' Balance of Eighteen Hundred Dollars ($1,800) to be paid and deed given in five days.
“A. H. Pearson.”

The $100 mentioned in said receipt was paid by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cole v. Cole Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Peckham v. BalchMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Denby v. DormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Keys v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Flechs v. RichieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API