Legal Opinion

Black v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Black)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 27, 2001No. Bankruptcy No. 00-42539M. Adversary No. 00-4103Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES G. MIXON, Chief Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether Harold and Kathryn Black (“Debtors”) may treat a claim of Conseco Finance Servicing Corporation (“Conseco”) as unsecured or whether the claim is entitled to anti-modification protection pursuant to § 1322(b)(2) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors have filed an objection to the claim of Conseco and a complaint to determine the validity, priority, and extent of Conseco’s lien; Conseco has objected to confirmation of the Debt- or’s proposed plan. After a hearing on all matters on November 17, 2000,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Stephen J. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Domestic Bank v. Mann (In Re Mann)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API