Legal Opinion

Hyma v. Hippler

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1967No. Docket 1, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a dismissal of his complaint on the ground of res judicata.

Plaintiff, seeking to trace assets, alleged that the sale of property * by Alfred and Mary Hippler on January 7,1949, to Glenn and Helen E. Holmes was a fraudulent conveyance and should be set aside.

This matter was before the Michigan Supreme Court previously in Hyma v. Hippler (1961), 365 Mich 127. There the Court ruled in favor of the defendants, specifically on the question of whether Holmes had notice of a levy against the mortgage when he made Ms mortgage payment. However, the contention now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gursten v. KenneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hyma v. HipplerMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Snider v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Mango v. Plymouth Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Mango v. Plymouth Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API