Markuson v. Boucher
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA. The statement of the case is in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
On the 3d of January, 1898, the appellant presented a petition to the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota for a writ of habeas corpus. It alleged that the petitioner was confined, and had been since the 7th of December, 1897, in the state penitentiary of North Dakota, under and in pursuance of a “certain pretended commitment” issued by the district court of the fifth judicial district of the State, in and for the county of Barnes, upon a “ pretended judgment and sentence ” of said court in certain proceedings therein instituted on the relation of the assistant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baker v. GriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Tinsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In Re FrederichSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.