Plaza Amusement Co. v. Rothenberg
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentAnderson, J.
The members of the court are in agreement that the contract involved is governed by the laws of Mississippi, and not Louisiana, and also that the contract does not violate our anti-trust statute. • The disagreement is among the members of the court on the other questions decided by the controlling opinion.
Section 2273, of the Code of' 1906, Hemingway’s Code of 1927, section 5273, provides as follows:
“5273. Every place for public amusement shall have at least the following arrangements for the safety of those attending therein: The seats shall be located in rows with spaces between the seats…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- McAlpin v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Adams v. Standard Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Ward v. FaginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.