Legal Opinion

People v. Parilla

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2007PublishedCited by 48 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to file a motion to dismiss the indictment on statute of limitations grounds {see CPL 30.10). We conclude that defendant waived review of the statute of limitations issue when he entered his guilty plea.

In 1996, while in prison serving a 71/2 to 15 year sentence on charges unrelated to the matter at bar, defendant produced a blood sample pursuant to Executive Law § 995-c for inclusion in the DNA data bank. In 2003, this sample linked him to a sexual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. Di RaffaeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. The People v. Lerio GuerreroNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. CummingsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. KeschnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. SiricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API