Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Simpson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 26, 1913No. 2546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Hearing upon a certification of a judge of tbe police court under sec. 933, D. C. Code (31 Stat. at L. 1341, cbap. 854). of a question for determination by this court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robb

This case is here upon the certification of the police court, at the suggestion of the corporation counsel, under sec. 933 of the Code (31 Stat. at L. 1341, chap. 854), to have determined the, question whether a violation of sec. 878c of the District Code-by defendant, William A. Simpson, should be brought in the-name of the District of Columbia, through the corporation counsel, or in the name of the United States, through the District Attorney.

Said sec. 878c prohibits, inter alia, the refilling with milk,, cream, or other beverage, with intent to sell the same, any vessel previously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Wiseman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Klyman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. People v. MangoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lois Lange v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. District of Columbia v. Mark GrimesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. David A. Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. District of Columbia v. MoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. United States v. RickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API