Legal Opinion

State v. Wiseman.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

INDICTMENT against S. Wiseman, heard by Judge H. R. Starbucle, at August Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Mitoheld County. Erom an order dismissing the appeal, the State appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Eueoites, 0. J.

Tbis is a criminal action, commenced before a Justice of the Peace, under chapter 182, Acts 1901. The warrant charges that the defendant allowed ten hogs to run at large off his premises in violation of the provisions of the first section of said act. And the second section thereof is in the following language: “That any person or persons violating the provisions of section 1 of this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be fined not less than two dollars nor more than ten dollars for each and every offense, for each head of stock so allowed to run…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLaurin v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Comrs. v. . SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. District of Columbia v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
  4. State v. WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Lower Creek Drainage Commissioners v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API