Ash v. Traynor
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] The Workers Compensation Bureau appealed from a district court judgment reversing a Bureau order denying payment of attorney fees to claimants having fee agreements with their attorneys. We hold the Bureau must pay attorney fees, under N.D.C.C. § 65-02-08, to prevailing claimants who have fee agreements with their attorneys if the agreements require reimbursement to the claimants from the attorney fees paid by the Bureau. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The claimants retained private counsel to represent them in litigation with the Bureau over benefit payments. Some of the claimants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Haff v. HettichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.