Legal Opinion

Ash v. Traynor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2000No. 990330, 990331PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] The Workers Compensation Bureau appealed from a district court judgment reversing a Bureau order denying payment of attorney fees to claimants having fee agreements with their attorneys. We hold the Bureau must pay attorney fees, under N.D.C.C. § 65-02-08, to prevailing claimants who have fee agreements with their attorneys if the agreements require reimbursement to the claimants from the attorney fees paid by the Bureau. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The claimants retained private counsel to represent them in litigation with the Bureau over benefit payments. Some of the claimants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Haff v. HettichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API