Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taylor v. Langley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1941No. 29115Published

1DissentRiley, J.

“Little difficulty” is found by the majority in arriving at a conclusion countenancing a substantial compliance with jurisdictional requirement of section 13363, O. S. 1931. I am less fortunate in being confronted with an insurmountable barrier formed by four well-considered decisions overruled by the majority.

In the inception, the very essence, meaning and derivation of the word “jurisdiction” connotes: (Jus-juris — right-law-dictio — saying or speaking) the power of a court to entertain and decide any cause of action.

Equity has no part to play in deciding upon a question of jurisdiction. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Village of Glencoe v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Tidal Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Blake v. SmockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Goss v. CauthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API