Frazier v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The heads which we will discuss are (1) that the petition should set out the actual contents of the child’s stomach; (2) that pleading knowledge in the alternative is improper; (3) that the-general demurrer is good.
As to point 1, it is the contention of counsel for the defendant that counsel is entitled to know the contents of the child’s stomach which were pumped out. He further contends that, unless the contents of the stomach were alleged, any reference to having pumped out the contents of the stomach is harmful to the defendant, and such allegation might or might not benefit the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. PeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Babcock Bros. Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Pacetti v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Crawford v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Ed Smith & Sons, Inc. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Ed Smith & Sons, Inc. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961