In re the Estate of Levinsky
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.(1) The evidence in this contested discovery proceeding indisputably established that the decedent in his lifetime had opened a joint savings bank account with his son, Louis M. Levins, the respondent. The signature card described the nature of the rights of the parties as “ joint tenants, either to draw, survivor to take all.” A similar statement was stamped upon the savings bank book. In such a situation the effect of section 249, subdivision 3, *319of the Banking Law has been clearly defined by the Court of Appeals in three recent decisions: Moskowitz v. Marrow (251 N. Y. 380); Marrow…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gick v. . StumpfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of KelleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of LuntNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of HolmesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934