Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kelley
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slater, S.
Adelaide E. Frees, the residuary legatee, filed objections to the account. Upon the hearing, objection “ three ” was withdrawn. The other objections are dismissed with the exception of item “ one ” of the “ fourth ” objection, which relates *354to a bank deposit of $19,403.99, which sum was held on deposit by the testatrix in the Manufacturers Trust Company.
The objectant is the daughter of the decedent by a former husband who had died. Afterward, the decedent married Timothy H. Kelley.
On June 13, 1929, the decedent had a deposit of $20,000 with the Thrift Department of the Manufacturers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Estate of PoriandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of LofmarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
- In re the Estate of DarashinskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Security Bank of Utah N. A. v. DemirisUtah Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Cardosanto v. CardosantoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- First Security Bank of Utah N. A. v. DemirisUtah Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of KellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933