Sakellarion v. Judge & Dolph, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Judge & Dolph, Limited (“Judge & Dolph”) and Wirtz Corporation (‘Wirtz”). In the alternative, Wirtz moves to dismiss the complaint against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Wirtz’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.
FACTS 1
Plaintiff Elaine Sakellarion (“Sakellarion”) was an employee of Judge & Dolph from 1955 until she was discharged on January 10, 1994. She was sixty-two years old on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gudenkauf v. Stauffer Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Bryant v. Delbar Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998
- Brown v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Call v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Bayless v. ANCILLA DOMINI COLLEGEDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011