Legal Opinion

Sakellarion v. Judge & Dolph, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 18, 1995No. 95 C 61PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Judge & Dolph, Limited (“Judge & Dolph”) and Wirtz Corporation (‘Wirtz”). In the alternative, Wirtz moves to dismiss the complaint against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Wirtz’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

FACTS 1

Plaintiff Elaine Sakellarion (“Sakellarion”) was an employee of Judge & Dolph from 1955 until she was discharged on January 10, 1994. She was sixty-two years old on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gudenkauf v. Stauffer Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  2. Bryant v. Delbar Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998
  3. Brown v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  4. Call v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  5. Bayless v. ANCILLA DOMINI COLLEGEDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API