Legal Opinion

Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Wheelabrator Coal Services Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1990No. A14-89-00736-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees Wheel-abrator Coal Services Company (“Wheelab-rator”) and Pullman Torkelson Utilities Fuel Company (“PTUFCO”), (together “Wheelabrator/PTUFCO”), and the denial of summary judgment to appellant Houston Lighting & Power Company (“HL & P”), by which action the court below held that HL & P was not entitled to any contractual indemnification from appellees. HL & P brings two points of error alleging trial court error in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and denying summary judgment to HL &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Carlisle v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Paradigm Air Carriers, Inc. v. Texas Rangers Baseball Partners (In re Texas Rangers Baseball Partners)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  4. R.L. Jones Co. v. City of San Antonio Ex Rel. City Public Service Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  5. Rocass L.L.C. D/B/A Rocass Homes v. Nancy Zazueta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API