Manaudas v. Mann
Oregon Supreme Court
Baker county: James A. Fee, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. The complaint is in substance as follows:— First—That on the thirty-first day of December, 1877, the defendant Peter Mann, for a valuable consideration, executed to plaintiff his certain bond for a deed wherein and whereby in consideration of the covenants and agreements on the part of the plaintiff to be kept and performed, he, the said Peter Mann, agreed and bound himself that within three months from said date,…
Read the full summary
Baker county: James A. Fee, Judge. Plaintiff appeals. The complaint is in substance as follows:— First—That on the thirty-first day of December, 1877, the defendant Peter Mann, for a valuable consideration, executed to plaintiff his certain bond for a deed wherein and whereby in consideration of the covenants and agreements on the part of the plaintiff to be kept and performed, he, the said Peter Mann, agreed and bound himself that within three months from said date, plaintiff having first performed his agreement to pay the said Mann three hundred dollars, as by the said bond provided, to…
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, C. J.
At the trial of this cause in this court, respondent’s counsel argued both the grounds specified in his demurrer. Their examination, therefore, becomes necessary to a proper disposition of this case. In Manaudas v. Heilner, 12 Or, 335, much of the history of this controversy is noted. In that case, it appeared that the appellants Heilner & Cohn had sold the barber shop for six hundred *529and seventy-five dollars. It did not then appear, it seems, that the barber shop included lot two in block two in Fisher’s addition; but inasmuch as the appellants had credited the plaintiff with six hundred and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Decouche v. SavetierNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Manaudas v. HeilnerOregon Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Jansen v. TylerOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Bailey v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Snider v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Condon v. Bank of California, N.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.