Legal Opinion
Reilly v. United States
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided March 3, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-0748 PPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant in the present action, the United States of America, has moved for a new trial pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 52(b) and 59. Of the various grounds upon which defendant attempts to found its motion, only one requires comment. The other fourteen grounds defendant propounds are nothing more than a reiteration of that which was previously proffered to this court and ruled upon at trial or in its Opinion and Order of July 28, 1987, 665 F.Supp. 976. Unlike defendant, this court finds no value in the unnecessary repetition of previous rulings.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Conservation Law Foundation v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007