Legal Opinion

Omath Holding Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The issue here is whether the defendant City of New York in June 1986 properly terminated a 1968 lease agreement with the plaintiff Omath Holding Company, Inc. (Omath) where the lease term never commenced and the development *181contemplated by the lease had not begun. We conclude, as did the motion court, that the lease agreement was properly terminated.

In 1966, the city invited bids for the development of a marina, boatel and other facilities on a parcel of city-owned waterfront property which consisted of 66 acres of upland and 11 acres of underwater land in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Tantleff v. TruscelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Tantleff v. TruscelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hsieh v. Pudge Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 200 East 87th Street Associates v. MTS, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Pacheco v. Kushner CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Inwood Park Apartments, Inc. v. Coinmach Industries Co.New York Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Inwood Park Apartments, Inc. v. Coinmach Industries Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API