Legal Opinion

Pacheco v. Kushner Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*551The court correctly denied the motion of tenant Toys “R” Us for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of the third-party complaint in its entirety, since tenant failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact with respect to whether it was responsible for maintaining the sidewalk where plaintiffs accident occurred. Toys “R” Us established which lease controlled, but the lease provision regarding its responsibility for repairs and maintenance to the subject sidewalk is ambiguous since it is susceptible to more than one interpretation as to what constituted the demised premises, and as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feldman v. National Westminster Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Omath Holding Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Thomas Industries, Inc. v. SackrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Berkshire Equity, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Sheinman-Hardes v. Main 15 Lee Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API