Legal Opinion
Frizen v. Poppy
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 4, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 390 (1952)
86 A.2d 134
JULES G. FRIZEN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CLARENCE F. POPPY AND RUTH M. POPPY, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided January 4, 1952.
Mr. Richard B. Magner, attorney for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Henry St. C. Lavin, attorney for the defendants.
FREUND, J.S.C.
The plaintiffs, owners of one-family dwellings in the "A" zone residential district of the City of Linden, instituted this proceeding to enjoin the defendants from using a dwelling building as a funeral home, upon the ground that such use violates the zoning ordinance. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MAYOR, & C., OF ALPINE BOROUGH v. BrewsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Arthur v. VirklerNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Building Commissioner v. McManusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Giordano v. Mayor & Council of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trenkamp v. Township of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- PEOPLE FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Weber v. PierettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Burlington Tp. v. Middle Dep't Inspection Agency, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Schultze v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.