Legal Opinion

In Re Grondin Estate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1953No. 4234PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The principal question in this case is whether the word “taxes” in the preamble of the will indicates a testamentary intention that the legacy and succession tax (R. L., c. 87) shall be paid by the estate out of the residuary clause or whether each legatee and the devisee shall pay his proportionate share of the tax. Before deciding the principal question two preliminary matters present themselves.

Since both the executor and the probate court were in doubt as to the incidence of the state inheritance tax on the legacies and devise in the will, it was impossible to make an accurate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherman v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Prescott v. St. Luke's HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Norton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Ogburn's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Succession of JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of MumbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Matter of Estate of KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API