Legal Opinion
Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1953No. 19045Published
1Opinion of the Court
115 Cal.App.2d 395 (1953)
252 P.2d 31
WALTER METZENBAUM, Respondent,
v.
MURRAY METZENBAUM et al., Appellants.
Docket No. 19045.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.
January 16, 1953.
Milton A. Krug for Appellants.
Newell & Chester and Robert M. Newell for Respondent.
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by Murray Metzenbaum as liquidating partner of two dissolved partnerships (with only one of which we are concerned here) from an order denying him reimbursement for attorneys' fees alleged to have been incurred by him in behalf of said dissolved firm.
All of the parties…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- King v. . LeightonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Dingwell v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Stephens v. OrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1862
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.