Legal Opinion

Protective Life Insurance v. Hansen

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 19, 2011No. 10-2085PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Upon the death of Richard McDonald, Protective Life Insurance Company (“Protective”) filed this interpleader action, naming both Megan Hansen and B & K Enterprizes (“B & K”) as defendants. Hansen and B & K filed cross motions for summary judgment, each claiming to be the beneficiary of McDonald’s one-million-dollar life insurance policy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of B & K, and Hansen appealed. We have reviewed the district court’s decision de novo, construing all facts and reasonable inferences in Hansen’s favor. Finding no error, we affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winsley v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Richards v. Land Star Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. Donna E. Keca and Trisha Bontempo, Individually and as Guardian of Miranda BontempoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Vandenberg v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Jewell v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Beaumont v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Whitaker v. Appriss, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017
  3. Blasdel v. Northwestern UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. Babcock v. Biomet Orthopedics LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
  5. Brookshire v. Elkhart City PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API