Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 7, 2019No. 3:14-cv-00200Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MARSHALL BABCOCK, JR, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) vs. ) Case No. 3:14-CV-200 RLM-MGG ) BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants ) OPINION AND ORDER Biomet moved for summary judgment in this case contending that it is entitled to judgment on the merits as a sanction for the plaintiffs’ failure to preserve the M2a device that was removed during Mr. Babcock’s revision surgery in December 2013. For the following reasons, I am denying that motion. Summary judgment is only appropriate if the pleadings,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Collins v. IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Trask-Morton v. Motel 6 Operating L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Marrocco v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API