Legal Opinion

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Continental Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1958No. 5657PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity litigation, the appellant railway company and its oil and gas lessee seek reversal of the trial court’s judgment, holding, in effect, that the railroad acquired only an easement and not a limited fee title to lands within its right of way under the Act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 482, 43 U.S.C.A. § 934 et seq.; and more particularly, that the railroad has no right to the oil, gas and other minerals underlying its right of way. See Continental Oil Co. v. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co., D.C., 148 F. Supp. 411.

The undisputed facts are that appellant’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Wyoming v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. State of Wyoming, Oscar E. Swan, Commissioner of Public Lands v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary, United States Department of Interior, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. State of Wyoming v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Chicago And North Western Railway Company v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API