Legal Opinion

Corey v. Paine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1926No. 25,103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Paine & Gjellefald entered into a contract with Washington county for the construction of a judicial drainage ditch. They gave the usual public contractor’s bond, with the Federal Surety Company as surety thereon. They failed to pay claims for labor and materials furnished by plaintiff, and by two other persons who assigned their claims to him, and he brought this action against them and their surety. The trial court made findings in plaintiff’s favor and the Surety Company appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The surety answered to the merits and, as a special…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Litchfield v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Rosman v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Wold v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Page v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API