Page v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendant’s answer sets up the pendency of a former suit between the same parties for the same cause, and also a separate defence upon the merits. The two defences were properly united in the same answer. The plaintiff’s reply admits the-former action, but alleges dismissal, and puts in issue the further allegations in the answer. At the trial the defence upon the merits failed; and as to the plea in abatement, it is found by the court that at the time of the service of the summons in this action a notice of dismissal of the former suit was also served on the defendant, *369and was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. TroostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Beals v. CameronNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Chamberlain v. EckertU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1869
- O'Beirne v. LloydThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gibson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Manufacturers' Bottle Co. v. Taylor-Stites Glass Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Althen v. TarboxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Walker v. VandiverTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Nichols v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.