Legal Opinion

United States v. Shields

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 13, 1991No. 90 CR 1044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ILANA DIAMOND ROYNER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are the defendants’ objections to the government’s tape designations in this case. The Court takes the objections in turn below.

II. ANALYSIS

A. DeLeo’s Motion to Play Tapes in their Entirety

The government has for the most part limited its tape designations to conversations which fall within the time frame and scope of the alleged conspiracy between defendants Shields and DeLeo. For example, the government has not designated certain preliminary conversations between the government’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Thomas NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AndreasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API