Legal Opinion

Exel Direct, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 30, 2018No. Case No. 2:16-cv-446Published

1Opinion of the Court

Algenon L. Marbley, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41) of Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Sears, Roebuck and Co. hired Plaintiff Exel Direct, Inc., to install home appliances *887such as dryers for its customers. Exel Direct, in turn, hired independent contractors to perform the installations. From 2004 to 2008, both Exel Direct and its independent contractors were insured by a policy issued by Nautilus Insurance Company.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nicholas M. Patton v. Richard Bearden, Robert Bearden, and J.M. Bearden, Individually, and D/B/A Bearden Fish FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Teresa Tysinger v. Police Department of the City of ZanesvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API