Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jack v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 1937No. 26512Published

1DissentWelch, J.

The plaintiff here sued to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile wreck, alleged to have resulted from certain negligence of the officers, agents, servants, and employees of the State Highway Department.

Plaintiff relies on the provisions of article 18, eh. 65, S. L. 1935, as expressly consenting that she sue the state, and also as expressly assuming liability to her for any negligence of the officers, agents, servants, and employees of the State Highway Department.

It is fundamental that the state cannot be sued in any manner or upon any liability, constitutional,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Collins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API