Legal Opinion

Smith v. School Administrative District No. 58

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 29, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Tanya R. Smith and Joseph and Donna Smith, individually and as the parents of Tanya, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant, School Administrative District No. 58 (the School), granted by the Superior Court (Franklin County, Perkins, J.) on the ground that the Smiths had not complied with the notice requirements of section 8107 of the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 8101-8118 (1980 & Supp.1989) (the Act). 1 The Smiths also contend that their proposed amended complaint sufficiently set forth their claim of a promissory estoppel as a bar to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. City of Auburn v. DesgrosseilliersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Saltonstall v. CummingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. Gardner v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oceanside at Pine Point Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Peachtree Doors, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Wagner v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Longley v. KnappSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Webb v. HaasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Campaign for Sensible Transportation v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API