Flournoy v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Petitioner, Flournoy, was tried on indictment for robbery. The jury found him guilty of an assault. Conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. On petitioner’s application to the Supreme Court for certiorari the writ was granted. The insistence of petitioner is that in affirming the judgment below the Court of Appeals erred in three particulars which we will consider in the order in which they are argued.
Question 1.
Petitioner argues that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court did not commit error in permitting Officer Ward, for the purpose of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Willingham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Jaques v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Louisville & Nashvile Railroad v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Tarver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
- Nichols v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Farmer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Stairs v. StairsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.