Legal Opinion
Town of Sharon v. Anahama Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 12, 1924PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The action is brought to recover for damage done to certain highways in the plaintiff town. The allegations of the complaint show that in 1911 the Anahama Realty Corporation built a dam across the "White River in the town of Sharon, about a mile and a half south of the Village of Sharon; that for some years prior thereto, the Champlain Realty Company had maintained in the river at Sharon Village certain piers which it used in connection with the floating of logs in that stream; that after the dam was built, and on account of the increased depth of water caused thereby, these piers were built…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Donnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Ryalls v. Mechanics' MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Bacon v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Lockwood Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Schatz v. CutlerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1975
- Viens v. ANTHONY COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1968
- Giguere, Admr. v. RosselotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.