Legal Opinion

Hallet v. Aggergaard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Yankton County. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action by Ferdinand A. Haliet, doing business as Hallet & Co., against Peter N. Aggergaard. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

At the trial of this action instituted by a member of a Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce to recover his brokerage commissions and money expended in connection with the purchase and sale of wheat on that market on account of and as the agent of the defendant, plaintiff obtained the judgment sought to he reversed on this appeal.

Upon competent evidence received in support of that issue and submitted to the jury by means of a special interrogatory, it was found, in addition to a general verdict for plaintiff, that the transaction was understood by the defendant to be a mere wager on the rise and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Jamieson v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Pixley v. BoyntonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burke Grain Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Campbell v. HoodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API