Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Hood
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1931No. 986-5141PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEDDY, J. ..
Defendant in error employed plaintiffs in error, agreeing to give them a certain commission if they would procure a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase 2,500’ acres of land owned by him situated in Cameron county. In pursuance of this contract, plaintiffs in error procured the James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Company, a private corporation, as a purchaser; terms of sale were agreed upon and embodied in a written contract between the corporation and the owner of the land. Thereafter, the owner refused to finally consummate the deal, and this suit was brought to recover the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Merrill v. Allen (In Re Universal Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1986
- Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.