Legal Opinion

Woehl v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided July 10, 2009No. 4:08-cv-00019-JAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN A. JARVEY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court pursuant to the Defendant Hy-Vee, Ine.’s, (“Hy-Vee”) motion for summary judgment. [Dkt. 15]. Plaintiff Dona G. Woehl (“Woehl”) filed a response in opposition to summary judgment on May 29, 2009. [Dkt. 18]. On June 12, 2009, Hy-Vee filed a reply to Woehl’s response in opposition to summary judgment. [Dkt. 23]. For the reasons set out below, Hy-Vee’s motion is granted.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 10, 2008, Woehl brought this action against Hy-Vee, alleging that Hy-Vee discriminated against her on the basis of her age…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Cone v. Rainbow Play Systems, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API