Orr v. Smith

Felton, Chief Judge.

The only question argued by counsel is whether the contract of listing is too vague and indefinite to support a cause of action for the recovery of sales commissions. The contention of the defendant in error is that (1) the description of the property is too vague and indefinite and (2) ’that the price is too vague and indefinite, but only the first point is argued. The second contention is obviously without merit.

A contract listing real property for sale with a broker is not subject to the same rales as a contract for the purchase and sale of real property. It does not…