Legal Opinion

Neumaticos Goodyear S. A. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1947No. 46328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiff is a corporation operating in the Argentine Republic. On January 1, 1942, and January 20, 1942, it had purchased in Ceylon 1,948,459% pounds of rubber. This was requisitioned by the defendant on July 29, 1942. Plaintiff sues for just compensation.

*550Plaintiff filed a claim with the Board of Economic Warfare asking compensation of $463,361.19. This was based upon an alleged market value of the rubber of 22y2 cents a pound, plus $24,986.72 for marine and war risk insurance, transfer charges in New York harbor, and storage at American Dock Company. The Board of Economic Warfare allowed it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Gothwaite v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  4. Froemming Bros., Inc., of Texas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Hallman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caltex (Philippines), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Fabrica Uruguaya de Neumaticos, S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Foreign Trade Management Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API