Legal Opinion

Forat v. Rauer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1951No. 22175_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

1. Defendant’s contention that the payment of a bonus to the assignor of a lease does not constitute an overcharge of rent in excess of the maximum permissible rent under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 904(a), 925(e), unless the relation of landlord and tenant exists, is without substance. Rent includes “consideration * * * received for * * * the transfer of a lease.” Rent Regulation for Housing in New York City Defense-Rental Area § 13(10), 8 Fed.Reg. 13914. The recovery provisions of the Act are not conditioned upon a finding of the relation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Ricks v. CorakDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Toobert v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aarons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Floto v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API