Legal Opinion
Rowland v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 23, 1988No. C-1-87-0001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
Before the Court are the motions for summary judgment of defendant Trans World Assurance Company (Trans World) (doc. 44) and of defendant The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York (Mony) (doc. 46). Plaintiff has opposed both motions (docs. 53 and 54). Defendant Trans World has replied (doc. 55). A hearing before the Court was held on these motions on May 6, 1988. We have considered the arguments made by counsel and reviewed all the documents provided by the parties. We conclude, for the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc., Bankrupt. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neuner v. C.G. Realty Capital Ventures-I, L.P. (In Re Sharps Run Associates, L.P.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Bergeron v. Ross (In Re Ross)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
- Hatmaker v. Papa John's Ohio, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020