Legal Opinion
Larry Donnell King v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2003No. 01-55712PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Larry Donnell King appeals pro se the dismissal of his federal habeas petition as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). We review de novo, Patter son v. Stewart, 251 F.3d 1243, 1245 (9th Cir.2001), and affirm.
King’s first petition to the California Supreme Court was denied without prejudice with citations to two cases that require that one must allege with sufficient particularity the facts warranting habeas relief and allow amendment to comply. See In re Swain, 34 Cal.2d 300, 304, 209 P.2d 793 (1949), People v. Duvall, 9 Cal.4th 464, 474, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 259, 886 P.2d 1252 (1995).
To…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Michael Allen Bowen v. Ernest Roe, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by70 opinions
- Joseph Stancle v. Ivan ClayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Waldrip v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Banjo v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hemmerle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.