Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Plato
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1993No. 91-2310PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Deposit Insurance. Corporation (FDIC) appeals from the. district court’s judgment against the FDIC as plaintiff and for Richard Plato and Henry Vanderkam (d/b/a the McMicken Group) as counter-plaintiffs. We reverse in all significant respects and remand to the district court.
I
In 1985, Plato, Vanderkam, and Richard Fiiqua 1 (“the buyers”), all attorneys, began negotiations with C.E. Veteo Services, Inc. (C.E. Veteo), to purchase an oil coating facility in Houston, Texas. On March 20, 1985, the parties entered into a tentative agreement to agree. 2 In an ad…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Timberland Design, Inc. And William C. Barnsley v. First Service Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Traillour Oil Company v. Earl Harvey Archer, Iii, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Coker v. Cramer Financial Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- J. Mahoney v. Shaun DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Vasapolli v. RostoffDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.