Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Cranor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1952No. 32271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this court upon the ground that she was sentenced for the felony of grand larceny, when the offense with which she was charged is only a misdemeanor.

In habeas corpus proceedings, when it is alleged that petitioner is charged with one crime and sentenced for another, and when the judgment and sentence is regular on its face, as it is in this case, we will examine the information only to ascertain what crime is charged, and not to *531question its sufficiency. In re Mooney v. Cranor, 38 Wn. (2d) 881, 882, 233 P. (2d) 850 (1951), and cases cited.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In RE MOONEY v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. In RE BUCKINGHAM v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In RE BUCKINGHAM v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API