Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. Beers v. Board of Canvassers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1908No. Calendar No. 23,171½PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Mandamus by John E. Bird, attorney general, on the relation of John S. Beers, to compel the board of canvassers of the seventh senatorial district to recanvass a vote.

1Per curiam

At the recent general election Charles E. White, John S. Beers, John W. Taylor, and Lloyd East were candidates for election to the office of State senator for the seventh senatorial district, comprising the counties of Cass and Berrien. Of the votes cast at the election for the office of State senator, Mr. White received 10,506; Mr. Beers, 6,971; Mr. Taylor, 384; and Mr. East, 377. The said board of canvassers having convened to canvass the vote for said office, in accordance with the provisions of the statute (1 Comp. Laws, § 3684 et seq.), the relator, John S. Beers, presented to and filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wheeler v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Vance v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lessard v. SnellOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Rainey v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Sevilla v. ElizaldeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. McGrath v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API