Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 22, 2007No. 3:07CR31 (AHN)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

ALAN H. NEVAS, District Judge.

The indictment in this obstruction of justice case alleges that the defendant, Philip D. Russell (“Russell”), an attorney who specializes in civil and criminal litigation in state and federal courts, violated two obstruction of justice statutes by destroying a laptop computer (“Computer”) containing photographs of naked boys and information about the sexual exploitation of children. The Computer belonged to Robert Tate (“Tate”), the choirmaster and organist employed by Russell’s client, a Greenwich, Connecticut church…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. KernellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. LaurentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  4. United States v. MoyerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. United States v. Wells & RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API