Legal Opinion
Rahlf v. Mo-Tech Corp., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 16, 2011No. 10-1113PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
In October 2007, Richard S. Rahlf, Frank Stelter and Scott W. Johnson were terminated by their employer, Mo-Tech Corporation. They sued for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA). The district court 1 granted summary judgment to Mo-Tech. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Mo-Tech, a privately-held corporation, manufactures molds for the automotive, medical, consumer-products, and computer industries. Before Rahlf, Stelter and Johnson were laid off, Mo-Tech…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- James F. HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Tina Grant v. City of Blytheville, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- June Brown v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Mary Canning v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Dr. Leonard Chukwualuka Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.